||"dawnbreak in the west"|
Monday, April 27, 2015
If Christianity is true, George Bush Jr is going to Hell
George Walker Bush, as President, precipitated the destruction of Christianity in Iraq. Possibly in Syria and Egypt as well.
The real Hugo for 2014
... Andy Weir, The Martian.
This book is ineligible. It is ineligible for the same reason as is Yes, Virginia, There is a Santa Claus; and as were Old Man's War, and Ender's Game.
But if Weir's book were eligible this year, the whole "Puppies" controversy would be moot. The Martian was frankly the best SF book I've read in years. It was the best SF book anyone's read in years, to hear the reviews tell it. I assume that Weir is like Kloos and wouldn't want a Puppy recommend if it were given him, but still - his book was much better than Kloos's.
The Sasquan rules - well, "hard cases make bad law".
Whose side to side with?
On the one hand, thugs are targetting cops in Baltimore, presumably union cops.
On the other hand, union cops recently went after conservatives in Wisconsin.
Ah well. Maybe I should just make some popcorn. At least, until I can be assured that those entrusted to serve and protect will, in fact, serve and protect. In the meantime, I have a book recommendation.
Sunday, April 26, 2015
The cult of Vani Hari
What a load of crap you deliver Yvette [d'Entremont, a critic of Hari, the "science-babe"]. Your “credentials” mean nothing if how you use that knowledge evidently leads you to the foolish thinking that is apparent in what you write. Food Babe is right in what she shares. Maybe there is some level of jealousy on your part that she IS making an impact, unlike you, who I never heard of before a friend directed me to this load of crap. Seems you are desperate to get attention by attacking someone who IS getting attention. You would have done better at gaining a legit audience if you would have just shared your thoughts on science issues without resorting to going after Vani. Her voice IS being heard and IS growing. Sad to be you “science” “babe”. smh (It looks like you mainly accept comments that support your claims. Very telling. At least you saw this)
To this poster, who based on her breath-bankrupting is probably a "fellow" female: D'Entremont's knowledge and training are ruled invalid because it has been used to come up with the "wrong" information. Also, D'Entremont is less "impactful" and as everyone knows, being able to lead a successful mob is excellent evidence of being correct. Attacks on Hari's assertions are personal attacks on Hari and, by extension, this poster.
If you scroll the entire article, you learn that Hari bans thousands of people. Sometimes they are banned pre-emptively. Often they are banned for disagreement. Anyone outside the community with an opinion on the topic is potentially a paid shill by the Evil Ones.
I have, to my eternal regret, participated in blogs like this before. Their proprietors are cultivating mental slaves and fanatics. Hari is running a cult. It is a dangerous cult, and her targets are enabling this cult whenever they cave to her whims.
Monday, April 20, 2015
Antifa guest-post at Jihadwatch
Gerry Gable, editor and publisher of anti-Fascist Searchlight magazine and leading expert on the extreme Right, who worked with the MoS on our investigation, said last night: ‘This is the biggest and most significant meeting of Holocaust deniers that Britain has ever seen. It is a very worrying development.’
The reason this comment is there at JW, is because the UK has let in a horde of foreigners, with their inflammatory comments against "zionists", despite that Her Majesty's Government recognises Israel's sovereignty; but it hasn't let in people who actually support said sovereignty, like Spencer. The Brits've even banned Geller. So Spencer's angle is, really, just to highlight the hypocrisy. Gable is an ally ... on that much.
Gable's an interesting guy. David Irving hates him (with good reason; Gable burgled his home). Gable also seems to be at loggerheads with other antifa outfits. He's a Zionist who is ambiguous about the EDL. He'd probably support a ban on Spencer. But Geller... not so sure.
Sunday, April 19, 2015
What did Scalzi know and when did he know it?
John Scalzi's Old Man's War was entered into consideration for a Hugo under conditions that, the Hugo committee now admit, flouted the rules.
Scalzi had the option of claiming that the Internet was young (ten years young in 2005 but hey) and that everyone was still blundering around, and of saying - yeah, I guess we all goofed. Well maybe. But if so, it's interesting to watch how Scalzi thrashes around and makes excuses. He doesn't sound contrite at all. Asking him to apologise for polluting the 2006 process is quite out of the question.
Given the bluster now, I have to assume that Scalzi knew that his situation was queer at the time. Back in January 2006, he floated some unease that they might nominate a different six-year-old work, Agent to the Stars. But now I'm seeing the guy do a lot of deflection. So, I suspect deliberate sleight-of-hand, on OMW's behalf.
Backdated material as protest-vote
The Worldcon can rule, if it pleases, that pre-posted material be considered; and that the backdated work with the most votes get a nomination-slot. (Preferably only one would get this form of "nomination", so that the ballots aren't stuffed every year with Golden Age zombies.)
In this form, the chosen zombie would become a pointed form of "no award", delivered to the sort of book that those voters wish had been on the slate. Suppose for the 2001 slate I had written in, say, Dune. Or Ender's Game for 2013.
The 2006 Hugo award for best-novel*
Over 2002, one John Scalzi serialised a sci-fi book on his website: Old Man's War. In 2005, the publisher Tor picked it up. In that form it was in 2006 nominated for a Hugo. (This is an award which the Sasquan / Worldcon put out every year. It's kind of a big deal.) The nomination was accepted as valid, and - when Neil Gaiman bowed out - OMW entered the ballot.
It is standard among publishers of peer-reviewed journals, at least, that they don't publish stuff that got published already. For awards of the best book in a given year, the awarders prefer that the book had actually come out in that year. Such rules are typically interpreted such that webpage-publishing counts as publishing. In effect, OMW had its shot in 2002 / 2003, and didn't get a nomination then. So it can't go through the editors and get a new shot, now. And so we find here; the rules in effect 2006 were, I believe, in Article 3 of the Constitution of the World Science Fiction Society, September 1999:
To that, one might suggest that a crisis was averted by the simple fact that, hey, OMW didn't win; but - well, keep reading. I have to make a lemma (er, digression) first though.
John Wright this year has a similarly pre-posted story which the Worldcon has now ruled unqualified. Vox Day disagrees with the decision and claims precedent: Card's Ender's Game and Herbert's Dune were both shortstories, both became novels, both novels are classics and both got awarded in 1986 and 1966 respectively. I propose (as lemma) that Vox is wrong for 2014 and that the WSFS was wrong for 2006. I am open to arguments that Ender's Game, had it come out in 2006, would be disqualified as well. Dune is a more difficult call, given how much else was added to it on its way to becoming what it is. OMW, for its part, didn't take on nearly as much redaction as Ender's Game took let alone Dune. But anyway, the 1974 Constitution (Article 2 being relevant here) wasn't as clear as was the 1999, so - past, different country, etc etc. Based on the rules of 1986, Card's Hugo rests free of an asterisk.
More to the point the Sasquan guys didn't tell the voters about how the book's backstory conflicted with the Hugo's own rules. So, those voters who went for OMW at the time were not, in the main, protesting those rules. They might not have known that the book belonged in an earlier slate. Those voters were duped. By accident, perhaps. Either way if they had known that this choice was tainted, they likely would have voted for someone else. Perhaps for the eventual winner, which was Robert Charles Wilson's Spin (also Tor). But perhaps for Charles Stross's Accelerando. Perhaps for Noah Ward after all. We just don't know.
And that means that Wilson's Hugo has a fat ugly asterisk pasted on it.
Thursday, April 16, 2015
The novel Terms of Enlistment is a lot like Old Man's War.
Each novel worshipped at the altar of Heinlein. And the author of each has turned around and spat upon the genre's fanbase:
My withdrawal has nothing to do with Larry Correia or Brad Torgersen. I don’t know Brad personally, but Larry is a long-time online acquaintance and friend. We’ve known each other since before our writing days. I have no issue with Larry or the Sad Puppies. I’m pulling out of the Hugo process solely because Vox Day also included me on his “Rabid Puppies” slate, and his RP crowd provided the necessary weight to the ballot to put me on the shortlist. I think Vox Day is a shitbag of the first order, and I don’t want any association with him, especially not a Hugo nomination made possible by his followers being the deciding factor. That stench don’t wash off.
Yeah, there's an apology... to one guy. It was a very narrow apology to that one guy. That one guy has accepted it. I'm still waiting for my apology.
If he even wants to give one. Since he's already deemed me a
UPDATE 4/17: Amazon saw fit to delete my comment appended TO MY OWN REVIEW. Which comment - after noting the Puppies controversy - made clear that I had no intention of changing the text of said review, nor of altering the rating I'd given it. I don't know why the comment got the eraser, but I can think of one possible excuse: quoting Kloos's own words. As you can read above, those words contained an obscenity.
At this point, I'm beyond caring. Kloos's book wasn't that good and it wasn't that important - I did him a favour by reviewing it when I did. I also have to consider Kloos's own fine example - when caught in a controversy, just walk away. So I've decided to delete my review from Amazon.
Thursday, April 09, 2015
Upload #110 - feast of crows
Back in 21 September 2014 I had de-linked "Solomon's Revenge" and "Reformer from Pharaoh's Family" because their content was going to be in Throne of Glass. Not so much, now. I've put those essays back up here, perhaps with better arguments in "Reformer"'s case.
On a less defeatist note, "Islamic Ethics" was basically incomplete before. I've gotten a much better handle on its topic sura 35; I see it as revolutionary, so aligned with sura 28. Also "Interceding with God" on sura 39 is in a better state now, definitely aligned with sura 28 - in fact 39 quotes from 28. (Found this out from Sale's translation-with-commentary, back in 1734. A long time ago... so, I really should have known better.)
Monday, April 06, 2015
Jonah Goldberg: fan of the state of emergency
We knew that Jonah Goldberg didn't really mean any of that crap he wrote in Liberal Fascism when he didn't resign from National Review in support of John Derbyshire. Here, he proves it again:
And third, substantively saying the Civil Rights acts were unnecessary is sort of like saying to someone who escaped a burning building: “You, know, you really didn’t have to throw that chair through the plate-glass window to get out.” In other words, it treats an extremely exigent moment in American history as if it were amenable to solutions spit-balled in an endless college seminar.
It was fine to blow apart the Constitution, and to institute a racial-caste society on blacks' behalf; because The World Can't Wait. And you shouldn't mention it because feelbad.
TL;DR on the rest of Goldberg's column. I tried reading further but he was just renegotiating the price, to paraphrase Churchill.
UPDATE 4/8 - Not a lot of self-awareness at NRO.
Defend Christian martyrs - whut
Reuters, idiotically, has the Pope calling to defend Christian martyrs. Think about that for a moment. Reuters needs to think about that too, and change their headline.
I'm not saying that the Pope has crowned himself in glory either. He's not called out those who have done these crimes.
So much for all that
I lost my old IMG files when Yahoo blasted my SBCGlobal server. So I'll try this on Google.
As you know, I like computer games, and I've tried to keep what I'd bought. One of these vintage games was/is Grim Fandango. Every time I'd bought a new computer, I installed the software on it. Heck I dragged the DVDs all the way here to Colorado and installed the thing on this machine over here.
So you can imagine that I was... a little disappointed at Tim Schafer's recent comments. I was going to snail-mail the intact DVDs back to him. But he doesn't have an easily-accessible mail addy. I then figured it was too much like hard work to find one, so:
As an aside, I still can't find that last HoD logo at pages.sbcglobal.net/zimriel/blog/TitleBlog.jpg because AT&T have mostly locked out those old pages from Wayback. But then, it never was all that great; graphic-design, as you ALSO know, isn't my thing. So I've put up a placeholder title-splash which is, at least, better than the placeholder I'd had here since 2011. The font is Wizzta 1.3; it's pretty good.
Next stop: Far Cry 4. 625 3rd Street, San Francisco, CA 94107.
Sunday, April 05, 2015
Throne of Glass is down for a bit
Throne of Glass hasn't been selling (whatever version you call it). So I need to rethink it.
The (real) second-edition will be more-focused, shorter, and cheaper; I'm also purging that "Algerian" Microsoft font from the front cover. The fat to be trimmed will be from the appendices for the most part.
Sunday, March 29, 2015
Radishes and rabbits
A few weeks ago, I ran across the meme-generator White Rabbit Radio, which panders to white fans of the Nazi Holocaust.
I say this because their logo has the Schutzstaffel's lightning-bolt logo deep in their rabbity eye-pupils. This symbolism is even less subtle than is that in the mulatto Frenchman's quenelle. But anyway, despite all that, I gave the Radio a hearing. Because - well, first, I'll admit, I was bored. But I did find that some of the non-Nazi memes deserve a hearing, starting with that famous "anti-racist is anti-white".
One meme over there was more complex than some of the others. In it, Adolf Hitler had been brought back to life and claimed he had foresworn his past misdeeds. The old villain "proved" this by moving straight to Israel... wherein he instituted Diversity. Israel, naturally, swiftly became a hellhole entirely hostile to the Tribe(s) - starting with observant Jews. The subtext is that Israelis know exactly what Diversity is and wouldn't ever allow it there. Therefore, Jews who pretend Israel as their homeland cannot deny homelands to other deserving peoples; like to, oh, white peoples.
It is possible that the Radio had intended just to troll the Jews and to stroke-off those fanboys of the SS who make up the Radio's audience.
But the Radio does more than that. The Israelis in the cartoon short never were very liberal; they spend most of their energies earnestly explaining to Hitler what his policies will mean for their nation. At least the Zionists here don't really deserve what they got; and the Hitler here comes off as a scheming hypocrite. I could see something like this coming from a conservative Jew as a warning to his liberal colleagues.
Other nationalists have noted that there exists a sharp break in Jewry between the pretend-universalist Diaspora and the nationalist Israel. And I think they've also noted that it might be worth the nationalists' while to take note of this:
Today, the slogan “Open Borders for Israel” is a way to point out the naked nationalist double standard and the stark existence of Jewish privilege. A decade from now, “Open Borders for Israel” may be policy. Will this somehow improve our own situation?
From a nationalist perspective it's our own situation which must be paramount; it's our own right to exist that must be asserted. SS-chic, as we find in the Radio - and in the "Daily Stormer" blog for that matter - focuses on the situation of others; it denies the rights of others to exist. The Radio's whole argument is "why one and not the other". Well... why, if "not the other" is all one can think of as a public emblem, should anyone support the one?
Thursday, March 19, 2015
Don't nominate a governor to lead the GOP
Any State governor currently running for office is neglecting his State. He might be talking a big game about Federalism, but if he's running for the office of Lord Of The Seven Kingdoms then he doesn't mean it.
Popular and powerful governors do have a way out: to seek out both like-minded governors and like-minded officials at the county-level within states like Colorado. This is Federalism turned against DC (and against Hickenlooper). This seems a more consistent way to preserve your state's interests and other states' interests.
So don't vote for Jindal. Don't vote for Walker. Don't vote for Perry.
On this site
Property of author; All Rights Reserved