||"dawnbreak in the west"|
Wednesday, April 27, 2005
Parting to the Left
The chief beef I have with Kennedy's brand of liberalism (pick a Kennedy, any Kennedy) is the Kennedys' belief that they can pay for their schemes with an income tax.
When the government levies a tax against personal income, they are telling the citizens that their labours do not belong to them but to Kennedy; and that Kennedy reserves the right to decide how much of this is fair. By extension the Kennedys arrogate to themselves the right to take all of it.
I've mentioned this before in an American context. I bring it up now because of a point made in NRO, that George Mason proposed this wording for the new (1776) Virginia constitution: "
This is, as Brookhiser points out, standard Whiggery as it existed in the mid eighteenth century. Unfortunately it doesn't earn much support among those currently lacking property. This tempts Whigs to concentrate more on the "equality" part of it. If fanatical Scottish Jacobites are the extremists of the Tories, their counterparts are fanatical French Jacobins. When the Whigs in England flirted with them, they lost all credibility there until 1830 or so. It took a name change to "Liberal" for them to dig themselves out fully.
What we see here is the second time the Liberals have made their choice between equality and freedom; and once again they have chosen the left hand path. For this they deserve another forty years in the wilderness. At least.
On this site
Property of author; All Rights Reserved